Behind the Name: Message: "Re: Nova... on a boy?"

< >

Subject:	Re: Nova... on a boy?
Author:	nsebastian (Authenticated as nsebastian)
Date:	April 20, 2012 at 7:29:24 PM
Reply to:	Nova... on a boy? by bex

In a weird way, it does sort of work. More interesting than on a girl, imo. But it'd just be a really bad idea to name a boy this. Maybe in 100 years it won't seem as out there. But for now, it'd just get too much teasing and embarrassment.

-
http://www.behindthename.com/pnl/119834

Because this message is archived you cannot respond to it.

Messages in this thread:

Nova... on a boy? - bex Apr 20 2012, 3:53:48 PM
- Re: Nova... on a boy? - cherrybear Apr 23 2012, 2:37:22 PM
- Re: Nova... on a boy? - caelex Apr 23 2012, 1:08:36 PM
- Re: Nova... on a boy? - Anneza Apr 23 2012, 12:05:50 AM
- Re: Nova... on a boy? - number1212 Apr 21 2012, 8:54:28 AM
- Re: Nova... on a boy? - abbasdaughter Apr 21 2012, 5:48:12 AM
- Re: Nova... on a boy? - gail Apr 21 2012, 4:24:44 AM
- Re: Nova... on a boy? - Chelsea Apr 21 2012, 12:26:35 AM
- Re: Nova... on a boy? - glaucous Apr 20 2012, 8:47:29 PM
- No way!! - Calla Apr 20 2012, 8:00:39 PM
  - Nova Star is stupid indeed... - RoxStar Apr 20 2012, 8:29:08 PM
    - Re: Nova Star is stupid indeed... - Aine Apr 21 2012, 6:27:07 AM
- no... - RoxStar Apr 20 2012, 7:48:30 PM
- Re: Nova... on a boy? - nsebastian Apr 20 2012, 7:29:24 PM
- NO! - Fiume dei sogni Apr 20 2012, 6:26:38 PM
- Re: Nova... on a boy? - Dracotorix Apr 20 2012, 6:17:05 PM
- Re: Nova... on a boy? - Isabel Apr 20 2012, 5:17:27 PM
- Re: Nova... on a boy? - Phoebe Apr 20 2012, 4:42:35 PM

View Message