|
|
|
| Subject: | Re: dated? |
| Author: | Ludwig (Authenticated as blaaarg) |
| Date: | May 25, 2012 at 6:47:04 AM |
| Reply to: | dated? by mirfak |
Yeah, my reply didn't really make sense. I'd rather be Cadence than Amelia, but Amelia more than Kaydence any day. I was just thinking that of all the things that Kaydence is, dated is what it is going to be the most. Everything about it is now-ish: the misspelling, the unconnection to tradition, all the sounds. Wasn't it the fastest rising name, all spellings, both genders, a few years ago?
| Because this message is archived you cannot respond to it. |
| Messages in this thread: |
| Home : Boards : Name Opinions Message Board |
About |
Copyright © |
Terms |
Contact Advertising served by
 |
Post a Message
Search
Help/Rules/FAQ
Board Home
Other Boards