|Author:||Ludwig (Authenticated as blaaarg)|
|Date:||May 25, 2012 at 6:47:04 AM|
|Reply to:||dated? by mirfak|
Yeah, my reply didn't really make sense. I'd rather be Cadence than Amelia, but Amelia more than Kaydence any day. I was just thinking that of all the things that Kaydence is, dated is what it is going to be the most. Everything about it is now-ish: the misspelling, the unconnection to tradition, all the sounds. Wasn't it the fastest rising name, all spellings, both genders, a few years ago?
|Because this message is archived you cannot respond to it.|
|Messages in this thread:|