Behind the Name
the etymology and history of first names
Login   Register
Search

View Message

 Post a Message      Search      Help/Rules/FAQ      Board Home      Other Boards

<  >
Subject: Re: Mark? Paul? Reasons?
Author: Pie   (Authenticated as Pie)
Date: May 31, 2012 at 8:29:25 AM
Reply to: Mark? Paul? Reasons? by Anneza
Paul and Mark peaked here in the 70s; in 1974 they were #1 and #2 respectively. Their tailing-off has been very similar, with Mark hanging onto a tiny bit more popularity than Paul. (Mark #201 in the last chart, Paul #213)

Interestingly, Mark was at #81 in 1904 here, dropped out of the UK top 100 for the following four decades and then had an unexpected resurgence at #32 in 1954! - I would love to know why.

I like them about equally, but Paul has a slightly more classic and intelligent feel to it, possibly because of more international use (particularly French - Cézanne & Gauguin?), possibly because of more consistent use in general. The US chart comparison is interesting:
http://www.behindthename.com/top/search.php?terms=mark+%26+paul

--------------------------------------------------------------
Want a search engine that doesn't track you,
or collect data on you in a creepy way?
Try http://duckduckgo.com

Because this message is archived you cannot respond to it.

Messages in this thread:

Home : Boards : Name Opinions Message Board About | Copyright © | Terms | Contact
Advertising served by SheKnows Family