Behind the Name: Message: "Re: Why is that?"

< >

Subject:	Re: Why is that?
Author:	Tiggs (Authenticated as Tiggs)
Date:	August 21, 2012 at 11:49:09 AM
Reply to:	Re: Why is that? by hyacinthus

Hmmm...Xaviera is unappealing to me. It's too much, too complicated. I am in complete disagreement with you on this. I don't see Xavia as at all akin to "ignorant" slang/communication, such as you suggest, and I'm a person who despises "text lingo". I take forever to type a text, but it's got proper grammar and punctuation.

To be honest, your "not elevated" remark suggests a pretentious outlook.

Because this message is archived you cannot respond to it.

Messages in this thread:

Full name for Lexie - NicoleMary Aug 20 2012, 6:21:31 PM
- Re: Full name for Lexie - Ranchie Aug 22 2012, 3:31:30 PM
- Re: Full name for Lexie - findthesea Aug 21 2012, 12:38:30 PM
- Re: Full name for Lexie - Abs mum Aug 21 2012, 5:31:15 AM
- Re: Full name for Lexie - Millie Aug 21 2012, 2:05:38 AM
- Re: Full name for Lexie - hyacinthus Aug 20 2012, 11:15:03 PM
  - Why is that? - Tiggs Aug 21 2012, 8:13:01 AM
    - Re: Why is that? - hyacinthus Aug 21 2012, 10:27:31 AM
      - Re: Why is that? - Tiggs Aug 21 2012, 11:49:09 AM
        
        Re: Why is that? - NicoleMary Aug 21 2012, 5:43:47 PM
        
        I was genuinely interested... - Tiggs Aug 21 2012, 7:26:43 PM
- Laurel Xavia "Lexie"... - Tiggs Aug 20 2012, 7:21:15 PM
  - I see what you did there... - kudriashkajo Aug 21 2012, 5:24:49 AM
  - Re: Laurel Xavia "Lexie"... - tazzz Aug 20 2012, 10:20:48 PM
- Re: Full name for Lexie - JLM Aug 20 2012, 6:36:30 PM
- Re: Full name for Lexie - Alcyone Aug 20 2012, 6:29:45 PM

View Message