View Message

Sage - more masculine or feminine to you?
So as the subject states, I am looking for opinions on whether you find Sage more masculine or feminine? Also if you could say where you live, as I am interested if that makes a difference in your opinion. Thanks!Sarah -
Wife to DH Paul (Since July 4th 2009)
Mama to Jasper Emmanuel (Since August 6th 2010)
Due with baby #2 (and boy #2!) in August 2014Lilypie Pregnancy tickers
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Feminine because the only Sage I know is female. I live in Australia =)
vote up1
Definitely more feminine. I've only seen it IRL on a girl, and it seems weird to me on a boy. I live in the US.
vote up1
I'm in Texas, and it's more masculine to me. It wouldn't surprise me on a girl, though, since I've seen it on both.I'm also seeing Saige more often than I used to, and always on a girl. It does seem more feminine.
vote up1
It's one of the few names I think is perfectly unisex. I can see it equally on either a boy or a girl. I have met one Saige, a girl, but no male Sages. I'm in New Jersey, if that makes a difference.
vote up1
Feminine.I know it's sometimes used for boys too, but it sounds feminine to me. I'm in Sweden.
vote up1
I think it sounds slightly more masculine when used as a first name. As a middle name it could go either way.
vote up1
Definitely masculine. I am in Texas.
vote up1
Definitely feminine. I think most plant names are more feminine than masculine, though not always. There are definitely boys who can pull off the name Sage, but I do think it's easier for a girl to pull off.
I'm from Wyoming & living in Iowa.
vote up1
I would say masculine.
vote up1
I think of it as more feminine, definitely. It's just a girl's name to me. I live in Pennslyvania in USA btw.
vote up1
I used to see it as masculine, but have gotten used to seeing it more on girls. If I see it as a plant name, it feels more feminine. It's not a name I'd personally use on either gender.I'm Italian, don't live anywhere Sage is going to be used much.
vote up1
a little more masculineNot by a lot, but maybe like 60-40. I encountered a little boy Sage a few years ago and loved it. Then a few weeks ago saw a picture someone shared with a little girl Sage, and was surprised to find I kinda liked it on a girl too. But I still think it sounds and feels a little more masculine. Plus the herb seems masculine, if that's possible, plus the adjective makes it seem that way too.eta: I live in the US

This message was edited 7/17/2014, 6:03 AM

vote up1
Hi :)Sage is more masculine to me in both spelling and sound, but if I saw "Saige" I would think "girl".I'm from the southern US
vote up1
I actually used to like this for a boy but now I prefer it for a girl.. I like in NZ and I would say that it would definitely be more feminine here.
vote up1
Sage as a first name strikes me as more feminine but I am not opposed to it as a middle name on a boy such as Emmanuel Sage. I would not personally use it as a first name on a boy which is how I feel about the name Morgan but I think they are perfectly fine as middle names on a boy paired with a masculine sounding first name. I live in the US.
vote up1
Sage is definitely more masculine to me. I love Sage on a boy, it's one of my all time favourites. Sadly it's pretty unusable where I live. I live in Belgium.
Sage on a girl is just ok for me.

This message was edited 7/16/2014, 11:34 PM

vote up1
Definitely feminine. I'm in Australia. :)
vote up1
Feminine, but it could go either way. I'm in the UK.
vote up1
I haven't met anyone with the name. I see it as unisex, but I have trouble seeing it on someone here. I live in the Midwest (Green Bay area).
vote up1
I see Sage as feminine. I live in the American Southeast.
vote up1
100% MasculineI love Sage, to me it's 100% masculine.I've taught 3 little boys named Sage and I know of 1 little girl named Sage.I'm in NSW Australia :)
vote up1
Well, the first time I was exposed to the name, it was on a girl, so for the longest time I thought of it as a girl's name. However, lately I've been thinking of it on a boy, and I realize that I'd really like that one too, perhaps even more than on a girl. I think it could really work equally well on either gender; there's really nothing overly feminine or overly masculine about it. A neutral name if I ever saw one, in my opinion.
vote up1
Oh, yeah, and I live in the US.
vote up1
Feminine.
Canada (Winnipeg, to be precise)
vote up1
I expect a boy, but only a little bit, and probably only because I feel like it's slightly better as a boy name. As a name for a man, it sort of evokes a sagebrush landscape for me (an appealing image), but isn't butch enough to be Westerny (like, say, Wyatt or Colton). I wouldn't be surprised to see a girl Sage at all though. On a girl it seems more herbal and urban, and reminds me of the color. I am pretty sure I have seen it on both. I live in Washington state.

This message was edited 7/16/2014, 5:05 PM

vote up1
Sage is all boy to me. It makes me think of some Wild Western cowboy, even though I doubt many were named Sage. I'm from the US.
vote up1
So far I've only ever met a male Sage, so I generally assume boy first and that's what I prefer it on, but I feel like it works pretty well for either.
vote up1
I would expect a Sage to be feminine but I actually think I prefer it on a boy. I'm from the UK and it's not popular there on either gender.
vote up1