Medieval Child
Replies
Emma *love*
Alice without a doubt, it's one of my fave girl names.
That's really hard. I love quite a few of those.
Hm... I choose Beatrice. I'd love to have a little Birdie.
Hm... I choose Beatrice. I'd love to have a little Birdie.
Alice. It has a lovely sound, like a light bell ringing.
I'd choose either Juliana or Matilda. Emma is nice, but it's my own name: it could be considerable as a middle name, though. Alice, Beatrice, Cecily and Margery are also lovely, but they don't work that well in my home country (Finland). Well, maybe for a Swedish-speaking person, but I'm not one, so...
This message was edited 8/14/2014, 1:10 AM
Emma. I'd be happy with Emma whether it's 1314 or 2014. I've loved it forever.
Avice. I've never heard it before, but I like it the best of the bunch.
Hmm... as somebody with a background in medieval studies, I have doubts about the % number here. Birth (baptism, marriage, census-type, more likely) records from the period also aren't necessarily reflective of society as a whole, even if they are extant. Especially for girls. As someone else mentioned, you also have to account for the fact it's the richer people getting in the record-books largely.
Nonetheless... most of these seem like pretty plausible names for the medieval period in England. Although I'm sure these would vary *greatly* depending on what part of the roughly 1000 year medieval period we're talking about (I see that your source is talking about 13th/14th centuries). And it would probably vary among classes, and regions of England. And then there's the question of whether different spellings constitute different names (as in the US name rankings).
Your source is very interesting, and I like seeing all the alternate spellings! I only wish it had some references :)
My little tangent aside (sorry!)... I'm a fan of most names on the list! I'd love to see something more unusual like Margery, Cecily, or Agnes get popular again.
I'd pick Juliana. I like the name's sound and look, and think it works well as a modern name too. Plus it might be cool to reference the medieval mystic called Julian of Norwich :)
Nonetheless... most of these seem like pretty plausible names for the medieval period in England. Although I'm sure these would vary *greatly* depending on what part of the roughly 1000 year medieval period we're talking about (I see that your source is talking about 13th/14th centuries). And it would probably vary among classes, and regions of England. And then there's the question of whether different spellings constitute different names (as in the US name rankings).
Your source is very interesting, and I like seeing all the alternate spellings! I only wish it had some references :)
My little tangent aside (sorry!)... I'm a fan of most names on the list! I'd love to see something more unusual like Margery, Cecily, or Agnes get popular again.
I'd pick Juliana. I like the name's sound and look, and think it works well as a modern name too. Plus it might be cool to reference the medieval mystic called Julian of Norwich :)
Agnes, it's a family name for me.
Alice. It's a long-standing favorite anyway.
Damn, the author doesn't cite his/her sources! I'm surprised at Rohesia getting such a large cut as my usual sources don't support that.
The thing is, there *aren't* any birth records from that time period. The only things that come close are parish records of baptisms, but the survival of those from the medieval period is extremely patchy, and the earlier you go the less likely they are to have survived. Most of what we know about naming traditions in the medieval period is from references to people in a wide range of other sources - guild registers, tax rolls, lists of land owners, diaries, letters and so on. There's no consistent lists to look up and it's difficult to find definite numbers for any name.
This message was edited 8/13/2014, 10:57 AM
That's rather sad, when I think on it. I wonder how peasants and such named their children. Did they follow the trends of the rich? Or was there a whole other naming culture being used that we'll probably never know about?
Splitting hairs.
I guess there's no accounting for the heathens.
I guess there's no accounting for the heathens.
Only the rich ones. ;)
I guess I misinterpreted.
My apologies. I
(Deleting what I originally had )
My apologies. I
(Deleting what I originally had )
This message was edited 8/13/2014, 12:11 PM
Nice to be defended, anyway - thanks! :)
I could be wrong, but I think he's talking about people missing from baptism records
I assumed that too.
That's what I thought she meant too, although calling the fact that there's nothing even remotely like birth records 'splitting hairs' seems to be missing the point rather a bit!
Snap, lol.
Hmmmmmm. Cecily, I think.