View Message

Medieval Child
The following names accounted for 60% of baby girls born in medieval England.Agnes
Alice
Avice
Beatrice
Cecily
Emma
Isabella
Joan
Juliana
Margery
Matilda
RohesiaOf these, which ONE would you choose for your child?

Visit my Pinterest gallery! http://www.pinterest.com/bhomayou/images-qui-r%C3%A9sonnent/
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Emma *love*
vote up1
Alice without a doubt, it's one of my fave girl names.
vote up1
That's really hard. I love quite a few of those.Hm... I choose Beatrice. I'd love to have a little Birdie.
vote up1
Probably Joan. Maybe Cecily. Rohesia is cool too but I'd prefer it as a middle name.
vote up1
Alice. It has a lovely sound, like a light bell ringing.
vote up1
I'd choose either Juliana or Matilda. Emma is nice, but it's my own name: it could be considerable as a middle name, though. Alice, Beatrice, Cecily and Margery are also lovely, but they don't work that well in my home country (Finland). Well, maybe for a Swedish-speaking person, but I'm not one, so...

This message was edited 8/14/2014, 1:10 AM

vote up1
Great names, It's hard to choose. I would have to go with Alice though. Juliana and Matilda were also strong contenders.
vote up1
I'd choose Alice or Juliana. :)
vote up1
Emma. I'd be happy with Emma whether it's 1314 or 2014. I've loved it forever.
vote up1
Cecily, but I feel like if I were alive then, I might go with Margery. It has such a pretty sound but it just reminds me of margarine.
vote up1
Probably Isabella, just because Ibbie would make such a cute nn. Agnes, Emma, Rohesia, and even Juliana and Matilda would be highly tempting, however.
vote up1
Avice. I've never heard it before, but I like it the best of the bunch.
vote up1
Hmm... as somebody with a background in medieval studies, I have doubts about the % number here. Birth (baptism, marriage, census-type, more likely) records from the period also aren't necessarily reflective of society as a whole, even if they are extant. Especially for girls. As someone else mentioned, you also have to account for the fact it's the richer people getting in the record-books largely.Nonetheless... most of these seem like pretty plausible names for the medieval period in England. Although I'm sure these would vary *greatly* depending on what part of the roughly 1000 year medieval period we're talking about (I see that your source is talking about 13th/14th centuries). And it would probably vary among classes, and regions of England. And then there's the question of whether different spellings constitute different names (as in the US name rankings).Your source is very interesting, and I like seeing all the alternate spellings! I only wish it had some references :)My little tangent aside (sorry!)... I'm a fan of most names on the list! I'd love to see something more unusual like Margery, Cecily, or Agnes get popular again. I'd pick Juliana. I like the name's sound and look, and think it works well as a modern name too. Plus it might be cool to reference the medieval mystic called Julian of Norwich :)
vote up1
Agnes, it's a family name for me.
vote up1
I'd choose Alice.I wouldn't mind using Alice Agnes Matilda as a combination, either.
vote up1
Alice. It's a long-standing favorite anyway.
vote up1
Cecily, probably. Definitely not Rohesia, it sounds like a disease. Or like Rhodesia, which makes me think of colonialism.
vote up1
Lol, %60?? What a terrible time to be a namenerd! :)Hm, my favourites from the list would be Cecily and Matilda. But I might be tempted to go with Avice, for the obscurity factor. I kinda like all three.
vote up1
Oh wow, Rohesia. That is really pretty. I'll have to put some thought into that one, but as it stands, the one that I would definitely consider using is Cecily, with Margery at a close second (though I'd spell it Marjory, apt as not). Very interesting list.
vote up1
I would choose Margery.I prefer the spelling Marjorie, but never mind, they both sound the same. Given a second daughter, I'd choose Juliana.
vote up1
Agnes, Beatrice and Cecily are all amongst my top names. Oh, goodness... I'm going to have to say Agnes, I think.
vote up1
I'd probably opt for my darling Margery, though I'd also be alluringly courted by Agnes, Joan, and Rohesia.
vote up1
Parents in medieval England had great taste, apparently, which makes this hard. Avice is interesting, so is Rohesia ... But I have to say Cecily. :)
vote up1
Just curious - what's your source for that statistic? What time period does it cover? I do medieval re-enactment so I really enjoy reading about medieval names.I would choose Cecily, without hesitation. Matilda would come a close second.
vote up1
Damn, the author doesn't cite his/her sources! I'm surprised at Rohesia getting such a large cut as my usual sources don't support that.
vote up1
Perhaps the statistic includes all forms of Rose. I'm pretty sure the author (Lucifer) has also written a pretty good article on Renaissance names, so maybe his sources are there. I'll check. I don't see how it could be based on anything other than birth records.
vote up1
The thing is, there *aren't* any birth records from that time period. The only things that come close are parish records of baptisms, but the survival of those from the medieval period is extremely patchy, and the earlier you go the less likely they are to have survived. Most of what we know about naming traditions in the medieval period is from references to people in a wide range of other sources - guild registers, tax rolls, lists of land owners, diaries, letters and so on. There's no consistent lists to look up and it's difficult to find definite numbers for any name.

This message was edited 8/13/2014, 10:57 AM

vote up1
There weren't birth records as such in the UK until the 1500s. Lists of medieval names are usually sourced from tax censuses, land ownership accounts and other legal documents, thus skewed towards the richer end of the population.
I'd also go with Cecily. :)
vote up1
That's rather sad, when I think on it. I wonder how peasants and such named their children. Did they follow the trends of the rich? Or was there a whole other naming culture being used that we'll probably never know about?
vote up1
Splitting hairs.I guess there's no accounting for the heathens.
vote up1
Only the rich ones. ;)
vote up1
I guess I misinterpreted.My apologies. I
(Deleting what I originally had )

This message was edited 8/13/2014, 12:11 PM

vote up1
Nice to be defended, anyway - thanks! :)
vote up1
I could be wrong, but I think he's talking about people missing from baptism records
QuoteThe only things that come close [to birth records] are parish records of baptisms
vote up1
I assumed that too.
vote up1
That's what I thought she meant too, although calling the fact that there's nothing even remotely like birth records 'splitting hairs' seems to be missing the point rather a bit!
vote up1
Snap, lol.
vote up1
Hmmmmmm. Cecily, I think.
vote up1