View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

Re: And? (nt)
in reply to a message by LMS
I only expect to elicit a response from those with whom the resonance intersects -- I am not in the habit of even clicking on the replies from posters whose replies are invariably bratty and negative.

Visit my Pinterest gallery! http://www.pinterest.com/bhomayou/images-qui-r%C3%A9sonnent/
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

I've hesitated a lot before posting this, because I don't want to seem like I'm criticizing you to an extreme degree. But honestly, I just can't help myself. Do you come here expecting and/or demanding only positive responses? To be agreed with only and never disagreed with? For the primary purpose of self-expression? If so, then I think you're in the wrong place. You should just start your own name blog, and express yourself there, and not ask for anyone else's opinions, and not allow comments.
vote up1
It's in deep archive now, but I'm pretty sure he used to do a lot of this and someone called it masturbation.
vote up1
I guess I just don't understand the point of posting them without a question attached, such as "What do you think of these" or "would this make a good sibset" as this is an opinions board. Thats not being "bratty and negative" thats trying to answer whatever question you had when it wasn't explicitly noted. In that case I like:Susannah
Matilda
Lucy
Benjamin
Alice
vote up1
Hate to throw my lot in with she-who-shall-not-be-named, who of -course- weighed in on this already, but I completely agree with you and Rachel Shaina and blah. I mean, I read the title and had no idea what was going on - and then looked at the post and still had no idea. I mean, what's the point of the list? Am I, like, meant to name the ones I like or what? It's not a discussion really. No offense, Puck! You have unusual taste in names which is cool, but I don't get this at all...
vote up1