View Message

new baby!
Jaxxin (m) - what do you think?? ew.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

I'm not very fond of Jackson, but it's an OK name. Jaxxin, otoh, is awful!
vote up1
Eww is right. I don't understand the logic of some of these overly complicated modern spellings. My eyes are still bleeding from what I read the other day -- about a little girl named Knatalye (translation: Natalie). Worse is that her twin is named Adeline. I'm curious why the parents chose one traditional spelling and one wonky spelling.
vote up1
Terrible! Taking tacky, trendy spelling to a whole new level! At least it's a boy and not a girl, that's the only plus.
vote up1
As if Jaxon wasn't bad enough.
vote up1
You know what, I've became so jaded at the terrible name choices some people give their kids these days, that it's impossible for me to be disgusted anymore. I will, however, hope the parents' common sense comes in and they change it to give him a proper spelling of the name before it's too late.
vote up1
That's one of the worst spellings of Jackson I've ever seen. I am not hugely fond of Jackson, but it's one of the few surnames that doesn't make me shudder, but Jaxxin is a really crap spelling.
vote up1
I've seen Jaxzyn as well. I don't know what's worst.
vote up1
I vote Jaxzyn!These childen/babies already seem so uneducated...
vote up1
Jaxin is bad enough but they had to even add the extra x. No, they're both very bad. Poor child.
vote up1
Obviously it's hideous. So I'm going to try to find a silver lining...
Um...It's phonetic, at least, so it is logical to read.
The nickname Jax is decent, I guess.
I don't know.
I tried.
vote up1
I love your response!
vote up1
Like it if spelled properly - Jackson.
Jaxxin is digusting.
vote up1
wrong place

This message was edited 2/22/2015, 11:55 AM

vote up1