View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

Re: Surnames as first names
I don't mind, and sometimes like, them when they sound at least as much like first-names to me as they sound like surnames.
Almost every one of the names New Chloe picked are what I would call "first-namey."
Some trendy surnames that I think are first-namey enough that I don't complain about them being surnames (although they're not names I like): Aubrey, Avery, Mason, Madison, Logan, Wyatt, Hayley.
I mind them sounding surname-y less, if they are relatively unique and don't have a common-surname vibe, and seem like they must have been a family name rather than picked for their trendy surnamey sound.I dislike them when they sound like they're surnames and are best known as surnames (most -er, -son, ton names), because calling someone by them makes it sound like you're addressing them by a surname ... like in a men's locker room. And I dislike them when they are distinctive recognizable corporate, brand, or celebrity names like Chase, Bentley, Harlow, Monroe, Aniston, Beckham, Presley etc ... Kennedy and Cassidy are borderline).A lot of these ones that I like, are really much more first-names than surnames to me, but technically they are surname names:Hollis
Merrick
Marshall
Camden
Vaughn
Brandon
Clark
Kirk
Drake
Elliot
Darwin
Alden
Hallam
Forest
Hollis
Kendrick
Leslie
Hunter
- mirfak

This message was edited 2/26/2015, 9:46 AM

Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

You listed Hollis twice, but that's okay, because Hollis is awesome.
vote up1