New Post
Search
HelpAnd wasn't it wonderful?
in reply to a message by Bear
What did you have to go and do that for?
:)
Three boys nappin', one mama namenerdin'
To peruse my top 100ish names: http://www.behindthename.com/pnl/82589
He is becoming greater, I am becoming less
Bits of the journey here: http://jodifriesen.blogspot.ca/
And some family cuteness here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/41705228@N08/
:)
Three boys nappin', one mama namenerdin'
To peruse my top 100ish names: http://www.behindthename.com/pnl/82589
He is becoming greater, I am becoming less
Bits of the journey here: http://jodifriesen.blogspot.ca/
And some family cuteness here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/41705228@N08/
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
Hey at least nobody here is doing this:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/theweekinpictures/11561091/The-week-in-pictures-25th-April-2015.html?frame=3274450
Anyway, I can't figure out why there hasn't been a British royal girl named Victoria yet and I want one dammit.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/theweekinpictures/11561091/The-week-in-pictures-25th-April-2015.html?frame=3274450
Anyway, I can't figure out why there hasn't been a British royal girl named Victoria yet and I want one dammit.
1
It's one of Princess Eugenie's mns- Eugenie Victoria Helena. I think it would be a good name. Not too common among the family, still obviously royal.
Just not Diana. That's the only thing I'm hoping for if it's a girl. They're comparing Kate to her late mother in law all the time, and even a Victoria Diana Elizabeth would be stuck as 'Princess Di' in the media, and they'd treat her like Diana reincarnate or something, and she'd have no privacy, and the hated cycle continues with the media.
Just not Diana. That's the only thing I'm hoping for if it's a girl. They're comparing Kate to her late mother in law all the time, and even a Victoria Diana Elizabeth would be stuck as 'Princess Di' in the media, and they'd treat her like Diana reincarnate or something, and she'd have no privacy, and the hated cycle continues with the media.
1
It's a second kid, so the newness of it all has worn off. If it's a girl interest will definitely pick up, but if it's another boy no one will care. The heir and the spare, and all that.
This message was edited 4/25/2015, 8:19 AM
1
ditto
This question was included as part of a random survey that Billina did over in the Lounge a couple weeks ago, but we've been lucky over here.
Put a dozen or so names from the royal family's oldest generation and draw a handful. Same old same old; they're not gonna surprise anybody and they aren't gonna tax their brains.
This question was included as part of a random survey that Billina did over in the Lounge a couple weeks ago, but we've been lucky over here.
Put a dozen or so names from the royal family's oldest generation and draw a handful. Same old same old; they're not gonna surprise anybody and they aren't gonna tax their brains.
1
Where is Vekalvin when you need him, eh?
1
B-b-but. . . how am I supposed to resist? I'm a pretentious, BBC-addicted name nerd? It's like they are having the kid just to drive me batty.
1