New Post
Search
HelpRe: And wasn't it wonderful?
in reply to a message by kudriashkajo
Hey at least nobody here is doing this:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/theweekinpictures/11561091/The-week-in-pictures-25th-April-2015.html?frame=3274450
Anyway, I can't figure out why there hasn't been a British royal girl named Victoria yet and I want one dammit.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/theweekinpictures/11561091/The-week-in-pictures-25th-April-2015.html?frame=3274450
Anyway, I can't figure out why there hasn't been a British royal girl named Victoria yet and I want one dammit.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
It's one of Princess Eugenie's mns- Eugenie Victoria Helena. I think it would be a good name. Not too common among the family, still obviously royal.
Just not Diana. That's the only thing I'm hoping for if it's a girl. They're comparing Kate to her late mother in law all the time, and even a Victoria Diana Elizabeth would be stuck as 'Princess Di' in the media, and they'd treat her like Diana reincarnate or something, and she'd have no privacy, and the hated cycle continues with the media.
Just not Diana. That's the only thing I'm hoping for if it's a girl. They're comparing Kate to her late mother in law all the time, and even a Victoria Diana Elizabeth would be stuck as 'Princess Di' in the media, and they'd treat her like Diana reincarnate or something, and she'd have no privacy, and the hated cycle continues with the media.
1