View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

Re: How are Katherine and Elizabeth boring? nt.
I don't think it's a question of standing the test of time. When I hear names like Elizabeth and Katherine, I also think "boring", but that doesn't mean they aren't classics, and it doesn't mean I don't like them. They're just ubiquitous; if I hear a name like Ashley or Megan, I can picture something more specific, like a woman of a certain age, because they are dated. Elizabeth and Katherine are blank slates because they've been around so long and have been used so much. I think that's what Mirfak was talking about, though I can't speak for her, of course. Willoughby wolloughby willina, an elephant sat on Billina.
Willoughby wolloughby wirfak, an elephant sat on Mirfak.

This message was edited 5/23/2015, 3:20 PM

Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

We'll have to agree to disagree about this issue. I respect each of your opnions, but I will say that, in my opinion, a "blank slate" would be prferred over a dated, trendy name.
vote up1