View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

Re: Agreeing on "Classics"
in reply to a message by Puck
As you say, all definitions are arbitrary. But I'd say that a true classic spans every generation. If you can imagine a name on a son or daughter, and have heard it used on someone of your own age and that of a parent, a grandparent, and ancestors, it's a classic. It doesn't have to have been popular in every generation, just used: it's about consistent use over a long period of time.Being from the UK, name usage patterns are different - I've never met anyone called Aaron who wasn't from the US, of any age, so I'd drop that, but ymmv. I'd also drop Arthur for inconsistent use and add Mark, Alexander, Richard and Stephen.
Hannah and Joanna have also had consistent use here for 400+ years.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

No British Aarons?!That is news to me.
vote up1
Not older ones. It made the charts in the 1990s, but not before that.
vote up1
Was this late 90s? Did Aaron Carter have anything to do with this? :P
vote up1