|Subject:||Re: No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted|
|Author:||Mike C (Authenticated as Mike C)|
|Date:||August 2, 2005 at 11:42:20 AM|
|Reply to:||Re: No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted by Chrisell|
I think his point is that there are less inflamatory ways to describe the site.
|Because this message is archived you cannot respond to it.|
|Messages in this thread:|