| Subject: |
Re: Kerwin |
| Author: |
Norah Namenerd (Authenticated as Norah Namenerd) |
| Date: |
July 5, 2010 at 6:37:33 PM |
| Reply to: |
Re: Kerwin by lizagirl |
It's possible that the chart you looked at only ranked names with a certain number of 'hits' or babies born with that name. For example, if the cut-off was 50, then the previous years there could have been 49 babies given that name... that would mean only a +1 or -1 drop, but it would be enough to make it drop off the chart. It could have had more or less the same (albeit low) popularity for years, but we'd never know!
| Because this message is archived you cannot respond to it. |
- Kerwin - lizagirl Jun 21 2010, 12:08:43 PM
- Re: Kerwin - Speranza Jun 21 2010, 2:52:25 PM
- Re: Kerwin - lizagirl Jun 24 2010, 7:52:11 PM
- Re: Kerwin - Norah Namenerd Jul 5 2010, 6:37:33 PM
- Duplicate - sorry - Speranza Jun 21 2010, 2:52:24 PM
Post a Message
Search
Help/Rules/FAQ
Archives
Board Home
Other Boards