View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

??
I missed that and don't at all agree with it and didn't know there was even any stigma out there. I've never seen it.
vote up1vote down

Replies

This comes from research published in 1980 done by Richard Zweigenhaft and his colleagues showing that college men with "Jr." after their names scored significantly lower than those with "II" after their names on scales of "Capacity for Status", "Well-Being", and "Intellectual Efficiency." The problem seems to be in the word "junior" itself. "Junior" always sounds inferior to "Senior", and especially if the child is called "Junior" as his nickname, that gives the impression that he's someone who's never really going to "grow up" psychologically. The Roman numerals have no such connotation.
vote up1vote down
Interesting.
vote up1vote down