View Message

Uh, Guys...?
BtN, gives the history of GUY as < WIDO "wood" or "wide."Why was this preferred over the etymology for "guide," ultimately
Quotefrom Frankish *witan "show the way" or a similar Germanic source, from Proto-Germanic *wit- "to know" (cognates: German weisen "to show, point out," Old English witan "to see"), from PIE *weid- "to see" (see vision).

Excerpted from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=guide
"Like arrows in the hands of a warrior are sons born in one's youth." Ps. 127:4
JoHannah Jubilee, BenJudah Gabriel, Aaron Josiah, Jordan Uriah,
Maranatha Nissiah, (Anastasia Nike, 1992-1992), Jeshua David,
Shiloh Joshana, Elijah Daniel, Hezekiah Nathaniel, Zephaniah Joseph
vote up1vote down

Replies

There are several reasons:* Germanic WIDO is a frequent name element (both in productivity and in usage) including Witegis, King of the Ostrogoths. In contrast, WIT is a rare name element occurring mainly in the name Alois.* As you see, the word guide has preserved a final "d" sound but Guy hasn't; suggesting the alternate etymology* Finally, you see people occuring as Guy in Old French sources and Wito in old German sources and Vitus in latinized spelling. This argument is the most compelling.
vote up1vote down
QuoteIn contrast, WIT is a rare name element occurring mainly in the name Alois.

BtN's article on ALOIS does not include the |*wit-| = "to know" element in it. It leads back to LUDWIG, instead.
vote up1vote down
Hm... need to check sources on this, but as far as I remember, the analysis of Alois was AL-WIS "all witting".I tend to favour this, because there is a dwarf called Alwis in the poetic Edda who has a riddle contest with Thor and loses because he was surprised by sunrise and dies.But I need to check sources again ...I the light of the previous argument: An alternative explanation of the name Alois makes a name element #WIT# (or #WIS#) even more rare and unlikely.EDIT: I checked Foerstemann (1900) and he gives the first mentioning of Alois with Cassidor, 5th century). He also quotes one Alafredus with sons Allo, Alaricus, and Alois in the 9th century. I think, this rules out the provencalic form of Louis as the first source of Alois (it can be a source for a later revival of the name).

This message was edited 4/20/2015, 6:45 AM

vote up1vote down