This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

Re: Is Margaret a variation of Martha?
in reply to a message by Mary
Did you determine if Martha was indeed Margaret? In my research, you cant go by todays approved nicknames as they did things differently 100, 200, or however many years ago. I found your thread because I have a woman by the name of Martha, at least in her later years, but I believe went by Margaret as a child. Nicknames dont even have to be based off the given name as mine is Robert b ut everyone calls me Darby. So you never know
vote up1vote down

Replies

It's true. People often changed names back and forth. I'm having a similar issue. My great-great-grandmother went by the name Addie in later years, but was named Martha Adaline formally and used at least in the censuses as Martha when she was young. I found out that her grandmother is named Martha also, but her aunts are named Margaret and Mary (also my great grandmother's sisters name). So, Margaret is a family name. Later, I found some school records with the name Maggie for a girl the same age as her AND her same-age aunts are both there at the same time and her sister went there later, I think. So I'm thinking it's her. But Martha as Maggie? Seems a stretch, but I can't find anyone else in their area that fits having gone to that specific school. Frustrating! I just wish there was some proof -- but I'd go for someone confirming using Maggie as a nickname for Martha, even though I know it seems a stretch. But you're right, you never know!
vote up1vote down