View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

Tradition isn't etymology
It's true that sacred scrolls would probably have a vested interest in name meanings for obvious reasons, but at the same time they're more focused on telling the sacred story than recording the etymological origins of names. Thus, name meanings can sometimes be suspect.Tradition is just that: tradition. Folk etymology is very common--such as Brendan's false meaning of "smelly hair"--and may easily be mistaken for true fact if nothing comes along to contradict it. Miriam's meaning is probably truly unknown for sure (though, of course, it does have a meaning; we just don't know what it could be!), and I bet folk etymology came along to fill in that gap of ignorance with a plausible origin or two. It could be correct, of course, but we have absolutely no idea whether it is or isn't.In short, holy texts may or may not be reliable, and pious folk etymology shouldn't be blindly considered (pardon the pun) gospel.

Miranda
"Multiple exclamation marks are a sure sign of diseased mind" -- Terry PratchettProud adopter of 15 punctuation marks. Check my profile for their names.
vote up1vote down

Replies

Tradition often turns out to be true, or close to truth, be it popular tradition or even "just" family tradition. Thanks to internet I've been able to check many family traditions and most weren't even exagerated.So to me it's better than saying that we don't know the meaning (especially since Jews have always been into names, words, etymologies... my love of names is a family tradition too lol).
Just my opinion. :)
~~ Claire ~~

This message was edited 4/9/2005, 8:27 PM

vote up1vote down