View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

Re: Thoughts on various names
Callista - I prefer Calista, but it's a beautiful name, no matter which spelling is used. I do think of Calista Flockhart, but I don't think it's a "one person" name that's off limits to others. I try not to think of that scary icepick Callista Gingrich. Ever.Catriona/Katrina - If you're in the US, I think Catriona is a needless complication. Katrina is attractive, and I don't think there's any reason not to use it unless you live in an area that was impacted by the hurricane. Elektra - Eh, this feels like the least usable name here, but I don't totally dislike it. I prefer Elettra.Tressa - It sounds like a shampoo. The "tress" part is too obvious for me, I guess. Saskia - My only association is Rembrandt. I like it, and I think it falls into that good zone of names that seem exotic but are still very accessible. Georgia - Gorgeous. Such a warm, rich name.India - Oh, India. I love it, but it also makes me uncomfortable. I can understand why it's so often trashed as a Rich White Name, a relic held over from the bad, old, imperialistic ages, but I also see it as a lovely and evocative place name with a decent history of use. I'm conflicted, so it's a GP for me. I'd be happy to meet an India, though.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Elektra is a favorite-but agree with you on usability. Not sure if I should consider this or not since it would not be a formal name change-just what I call her...BUT what I call her my morph into permanence.
I share similar feelings re: India. Like Georgia but it seems a bit duller than Callista and Katrina. Agree with you about the spelling complications-would stick with simpler one.
vote up1