Comments (Personal Impression Only)

A classic name with a modern feel. Refined, poised, and impossible to dislike. It sounds like the name of a fairy-tale prince (though I do love it for girls, too.)
I like it for a girl, if only for Jane Austen. I'm not enough of an Austen fangirl to actually use it, though.
This spelling makes me think of the well-known Austen Riggs psychiatric hospital in Stockbridge, Massachusetts, where I once did some temp work. Other than that regional association, I don't like this spelling of an already overly popular name.
This is an ugly name. The E makes me want to pronounce it differently. And it sounds bad enough on a boy, but imagine this on a girl: it's because of so many women's Jane Austen obsessions that would make them want to use it on a girl. After all, Bronte has been used on girls. What's next - Alcott? Dickinson?
In my opinion, this rarer spelling looks nicer than "Austin", but is still a painfully modern-sounding name reminiscent of little boys born sometime after 2000.
My wife and I love the name! To honor Jane Austen, we will be using it for our daughter's middle name.

Comments are left by users of this website. They are not checked for accuracy.

Add a Comment