Popularity in Scotland
compared to Callum
Numbers
| Calum (masculine) | Callum (masculine) | |||||
| Year | Rank | Percent Used | Rank | Percent Used | ||
| 2023 | - | - | #58 | 0.365 | ||
| 2022 | - | - | #58 | 0.383 | ||
| 2021 | - | - | #56 | 0.399 | ||
| 2020 | - | - | #40 | 0.517 | ||
| 2019 | - | - | #41 | 0.483 | ||
| 2018 | - | - | #32 | 0.592 | ||
| 2017 | - | - | #34 | 0.588 | ||
| 2016 | #85 | 0.283 | #28 | 0.687 | ||
| 2015 | #94 | 0.247 | #19 | 0.875 | ||
| 2014 | #75 | 0.320 | #21 | 0.867 | ||
| 2013 | #67 | 0.375 | #33 | 0.718 | ||
| 2012 | #68 | 0.347 | #24 | 0.872 | ||
| 2011 | #66 | 0.392 | #16 | 0.993 | ||
| 2010 | #51 | 0.485 | #19 | 1.008 | ||
| 2009 | #52 | 0.484 | #10 | 1.227 | ||
| 2008 | #40 | 0.615 | #7 | 1.295 | ||
| 2007 | #34 | 0.670 | #5 | 1.485 | ||
| 2006 | #30 | 0.783 | #3 | 1.868 | ||
| 2005 | #34 | 0.737 | #3 | 1.848 | ||
| 2004 | #46 | 0.609 | #10 | 1.617 | ||
| 2003 | #34 | 0.773 | #8 | 1.587 | ||
| 2002 | #33 | 0.786 | #10 | 1.529 | ||
| 2001 | #31 | 0.836 | #6 | 1.815 | ||
| 2000 | #29 | 0.916 | #10 | 1.713 | ||
| 1999 | #30 | 0.945 | #12 | 1.706 | ||
| 1998 | #25 | 1.143 | #10 | 1.777 | ||
| 1997 | #27 | 1.098 | #20 | 1.373 | ||
| 1996 | #24 | 1.219 | #19 | 1.464 | ||
| 1995 | #24 | 1.214 | #21 | 1.328 | ||
| 1994 | #28 | 1.067 | #21 | 1.315 | ||
| 1993 | #29 | 1.032 | #26 | 1.189 | ||
| 1992 | #30 | 0.946 | #24 | 1.122 | ||
| 1991 | #31 | 0.872 | #28 | 0.947 | ||
| 1990 | #31 | 0.832 | #29 | 0.909 | ||
| 1989 | #37 | 0.732 | #35 | 0.763 | ||
| 1988 | #37 | 0.675 | #51 | 0.543 | ||
| 1987 | #63 | 0.392 | #55 | 0.465 | ||
| 1986 | #60 | 0.390 | #65 | 0.342 | ||
| 1985 | #58 | 0.407 | #60 | 0.378 | ||
| 1984 | #70 | 0.281 | #68 | 0.290 | ||
| 1983 | #74 | 0.264 | #75 | 0.256 | ||
| 1982 | #74 | 0.263 | #78 | 0.215 | ||
| 1981 | #79 | 0.216 | #92 | 0.156 | ||
| 1980 | #92 | 0.147 | - | - | ||
| 1979 | #90 | 0.161 | - | - | ||
| 1978 | #86 | 0.167 | #94 | 0.124 | ||
| 1977 | #86 | 0.156 | - | - | ||
| 1976 | #83 | 0.188 | - | - | ||
| 1975 | #78 | 0.194 | - | - | ||
| 1974 | #78 | 0.210 | #100 | 0.098 | ||
| 1973 | #84 | 0.158 | #100 | 0.106 | ||
| 1972 | #81 | 0.161 | - | - | ||
| 1971 | #70 | 0.254 | - | - | ||
| 1970 | #71 | 0.251 | #95 | 0.107 | ||
| 1969 | #68 | 0.249 | #97 | 0.101 | ||
| 1968 | #69 | 0.239 | #90 | 0.127 | ||
| 1967 | #70 | 0.218 | #92 | 0.127 | ||
| 1966 | #68 | 0.243 | - | - | ||
| 1965 | #72 | 0.200 | #96 | 0.098 | ||
| 1964 | #64 | 0.246 | - | - | ||
| 1963 | #71 | 0.190 | #87 | 0.135 | ||
| 1962 | #70 | 0.191 | #85 | 0.135 | ||
| 1961 | #82 | 0.139 | #84 | 0.135 | ||
| 1960 | #89 | 0.117 | #91 | 0.106 | ||
| 1959 | - | - | #86 | 0.123 | ||
| 1958 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1957 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1956 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1955 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1954 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1953 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1952 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1951 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1950 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1949 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1948 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1947 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1946 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1945 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1944 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1943 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1942 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1941 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1940 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1939 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1938 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1937 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1936 | - | - | - | - | ||
| 1935 | - | - | - | - | ||
 |
|
|||||