View Message

Do you think Sienna is tacky or dated?
Just wondering because I heard this a few times. I really like Sienna.If yes, does your impression change with Siena?
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

No, not particularly. I definitely don’t find it dated, it’s miles away from it imo. It’s modern and trendy in my eyes. I just find it kind of whiney and annoying.
vote up1
Not tacky, but is dated/will date. I really like it, but I’m not sure if I’d ever use it on a child because of this, and it makes me sad.Siena looks incomplete.

This message was edited 1/27/2021, 5:22 PM

vote up1
Tacky yes, dated no. Siena seems slightly fresher, but she stills feels like she's trying too hard.
vote up1
I do, but I still like it. It has a similar vibe as Britney and Melissa for me, but a little more interesting because it's rarer.I think it's a pretty name. Siena makes it a little more ... educated? And also a little less appealling. The double N is so namey.
vote up1
No, I don't think it's tacky or dated.
Siena just looks incomplete to me.
vote up1
I guess it's kinda tacky, because it's a combo between a colour-name and a place-name, which are both pretty tacky practices. But it's not really *fun* tacky, it's rather dry. It's mainstream tacky, so it's lost its potency.
vote up1
I think it’s starting to have a downmarket feel to it in the UK. It isn’t dated yet but I do think it is going to sound dated in a few years.
vote up1
Neither. It definitely isn’t dated, it’s not really tacky either.
vote up1
Sienna seems somewhat dated in a early 2000s way, I think because of Sienna Miller and it's similarity to Sierra (which definitely seems dated). Siena seems much more classic. The Sienas (one N) that I know are Spanish and were probably named for the Saint, so it seems a little more historic and timeless.
vote up1
No! I think it's pretty and classic. Same with Siena. Nice
vote up1
Definitely it doesn't seem dated to me.
vote up1