View Message

[Opinions] John
Wdyt of John?
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Snoresville. Seriously, I know it's a classic yet it does absolutely nothing for me. I do like the nn Jack, however. Having said all that, I don't mind it on some people. My middle dd's boyfriend is named John (actually, it's John-Edward) and the name does suit him completely. He has a younger sister named Ellen and it's sort of odd for me to see those names (especially Ellen) on young adults. Then again, Ellen seems to really suit her as well.
vote up1
It's one of my favourite names. It might be plain and overused, but I love how solid and strong it sounds, plus I have family members bearing it. I'd definitely consider using John.
vote up1
I like it.
vote up1
Seems kinda boring, but it's a solid name. My dad's name and my middle name is Jonathan. I have a good friend named Johny. I probably wouldn't really pick it myself, but it's a decent name.
vote up1
It has very pleasant connotations for me - uncle, lifelong friends, memories. I would use it as part of a longer name - Johnathan, JohnPaul, Jean-Claude, DeJon.
vote up1
I like it a lot. This is probably the first period in the CE when John is uncommon enough to be readily usable.I'm a little conflicted, because I had a great-uncle John who was always called Jack, and now Jack is so common as an independent name that Johnny might be better as a nn; trouble is, I far prefer Jack, but only as a nn!
vote up1
One of the better boring names.
vote up1
Handsome and so underused!
vote up1
May I ask what general area you are from where John is underused? I am from Massachusetts, and as far as I can tell 2018 is the first time ever it was out of the top 10 (#13). I was born in the 90s and I went to school with many. And many of them went by Jack as a nickname, whereas I've seen a lot of very surprised comments from people from other parts of the Anglosphere that Jack could ever be a nickname for John.I do agree that it's handsome, though.
vote up1
It's not underused in the US. It was #27 last year. Granted, that's a drop from being #1 from time immemorial through 1923, but hardly underused.
vote up1
Double post

This message was edited 6/8/2019, 7:25 PM

vote up1
I like John. If I had a baby boy, I like to think I would be bold enough to just use John, but my very modern need to want a name that stands out would take over, so it wouldn't happen. Oh, well.
vote up1
Handsome, classic, blah blah blah....but also boring as hell.
vote up1
Hi !!!!Flat, colourless, boring.This is the risk for many traditional names and John is the main example.
vote up1