View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] Re: Birth Announcement
I don't see the logic of respelling Wyatt. None whatsoever, especially since it isn't a super popular name. It isn't as though there are bound to be like 8 other Wyatt's in his grade/school. It's an unusual spelling for sure, and also makes the parents look incredibly ignorant. (Sorry not sorry) And I agree, too many middles. Wyatt Edward Gene would have sufficed. That would had been a really solid combo.Though I suppose the spelling could have been a lot worse and appeared even more illiterate. Whyit/Whyitt Whyet/Whyett. *Shudders**~Rate my PNLs!~*https://www.behindthename.com/pnl/190318/127682 Boys
https://www.behindthename.com/pnl/190318 GirlsCapture-2022-04-13-00-28-40

This message was edited 5/18/2022, 7:02 PM

Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up3

Replies

Yeah the spelling at least has a sort-of logic behind it, why+at *minus the other T* The name just doesn't appeal to me even with the "proper" spelling.
vote up1
Yeah oddly enough, her spelling actually reminds me why I don't really care for the name myself. I mean it's alright, and certainly tolerable as far as names go, but the I'd never really been able to get passed the 'Why' sound. It practically sounds like "why it" to me. /:
vote up1