View Message

As in what does something cost? No thanks.

I'm not. Not only is it just another unattractive surname, it also is just a common noun as well, barely a name at all. It does, indeed, sound cheap and tacky.

Just another surname name ... not the best, because of the word, but I think I'd hardly notice it. It'd sound namey enough after a while.
There are so many that are about as clunky, or worse. I think Price is a shade better than Pierce. I think these types of names may inadvertently build the character of their bearers. A normal, genuine, and friendly response is sympathetic laughter. I've seen it happen many times. Bearers of names like that must learn to laugh at themselves and not to take things personally - it isn't such a bad thing.

I’m happy it’s not popular. Ironically enough it’s seems cheap and tawdry. It’s interesting though, I’ll give it that.

Terrible

On the line below your question, there's the word Tags. I think that says it all.

As a first name??? Very anti. It's okay as a surname.

---

Priceless I don't like either but it could be a cute twist on Precious I guess. But naming a child Price seems like naming them Dollar or Purchase imo

---

I don't like surnames as first names in general though.

This message was edited 12/30/2022, 8:39 AM