View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

Re: Margaret, Marguerite, and Margot
Margeurite by a mile. I think it's, on the right person, sleek and yes, retro, and elegant and little bit femme-fatale. At the same time, it wouldn't look too adult on a teenager (on a child, maybe, but that would be a passing phase) and if the bearer didn't grow up to be elegant and sleek and femme-fatale-y, it'd still suit them, it wouldn't look silly. Anyway, I love it. It would be great as a fn or mn.Margot, well, I prefer Margaux, simply because it looks less like Maggot. But I guess it also looks less fresh and more pretentious. Anyway, it's more mn than fn material for me.Margaret, I should like. I've known some wonderful Margarets in my time. I just find it dull.I don't think any of them need a nickname. And even though you've said otherwise, I think if you were to give Marguerite a nn, Margaux would be the way to go. Margaret "Peggy" wouldn't work very well here in the UK, at least at the moment. Too much of a vibe of a famous shrill character from a famous gloomy soap. But give it ten years, and that'd probably be forgotten, I guess. I still don't like it.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

QuoteMargaret "Peggy" wouldn't work very well here in the UK, at least at the moment. Too much of a vibe of a famous shrill character from a famous gloomy soap. But give it ten years, and that'd probably be forgotten, I guess.
Honestly, I'm from the UK and I have no idea what you're talking about now, let alone ten years from now.
vote up1