I've seen the ''Junior versus II'' question in the FAQ of this site, but I still don't fully understand it.
Does the child only need to have the first name in common with any close relative, in order to be called II or III and so on? For example, if the child is called JohnRobert, and its father is called JohnCharles, then it is appropriate to name the child JohnRobert II and its father JohnCharles I?
Or do both the first names and middle names have to be in common in order to be called Jr. or II?
I hope someone will please explain this to me.
Thanks a bunch! :)
Because this message is archived you cannot respond to it.
Messages in this thread:
Junior versus II??? - Marieke van Camp Sep 23 2002, 4:25:29 AM