View Message

While it's most likely true that most/all?? of the male Sarah's are errors, I wonder if people will look back 100 years from now and question whether all the female Riley's and so on were also mistakes. In other words, I wonder if there are/have been some historical name trends that we don't really know about and dismiss because the records weren't so well kept. It's probably not the case, but maybe it's not always correct to dismiss out of hand either some of the data.

---

Chels'