View Message

<  >
Subject: Re: Actually, Alan...
Author: S Llywarch   (guest, 213.122.201.249)
Date: March 3, 2004 at 6:24:10 AM
Reply to: Actually, Alan... by Merriment

Sorry, Merriment, but I totally disagree with your logic.

If it was 'non-existent', how's it 'reintroduced'?

You claim it is a Breton name; where did Breton come from?

Where do you get the info that the river(s) where called Alan and not Alun?

Because this message is archived you cannot respond to it.

Messages in this thread: