|
|
|
| Subject: | Re: Actually, Alan... |
| Author: | S Llywarch (guest, 213.122.201.249) |
| Date: | March 3, 2004 at 6:24:10 AM |
| Reply to: | Actually, Alan... by Merriment |
Sorry, Merriment, but I totally disagree with your logic.
If it was 'non-existent', how's it 'reintroduced'?
You claim it is a Breton name; where did Breton come from?
Where do you get the info that the river(s) where called Alan and not Alun?
| Because this message is archived you cannot respond to it. |
| Messages in this thread: |
| Home : Boards : Name Facts Message Board : Archives : February 2004 |
About |
Copyright © |
Terms |
Contact Advertising served by
 |
Post a Message
Search
Help/Rules/FAQ
Archives
Board Home
Other Boards