|Subject:||Re: Actually, Alan...|
|Author:||S Llywarch (guest, 220.127.116.11)|
|Date:||March 3, 2004 at 6:24:10 AM|
|Reply to:||Actually, Alan... by Merriment|
Sorry, Merriment, but I totally disagree with your logic.
If it was 'non-existent', how's it 'reintroduced'?
You claim it is a Breton name; where did Breton come from?
Where do you get the info that the river(s) where called Alan and not Alun?
|Because this message is archived you cannot respond to it.|
|Messages in this thread:|