|Subject:||Re: Generational naming|
|Author:||namebug (Authenticated as namebug)|
|Date:||June 25, 2009 at 3:09:57 PM|
|Reply to:||Generational naming by Dearie|
No there really is no "rule" saying that it if a father and son have the same name that the son has to be a Jr. Actually you can choose not to use Jr at all.
I don't think it confuses the lineage at all. Since II spoken is "the second" which is literally what your grandson is. The second.
II looks much nicer in my opinion, and who wants the nickname Junior? Anyway, as far as my knowledge goes, usually II is used when there is a possibility of there being a III.
|Because this message is archived you cannot respond to it.|
|Messages in this thread:|