This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

Re: Margherita and others
I agree. Two names very much in line with what you say are Catherine and Beatrice ... modern parents concerned with giving their daughters 'meaningful' names are very likely to select 'purity' or 'making happy' rather than some or other meaning that hasn't been current for a millennium or three, and it seems churlish to burst their balloons. Give them the scholarly information, certainly, but also mention the history of the names and how they acquired their present-day meanings, which by now surely have some status of their own.We don't, after all, mean that someone is blessed when we say they're silly, or lacking in wax when we say they're sincere. Why should names retain their original meanings when non-name words don't?
vote up1vote down

Replies

The "without wax" meaning for "sincere" is a complete myth. I don't know where the myth came from - probably a clever "reverse etymology" that someone invented for fun - but its current popularity is no doubt due to its use (and presentation as a "fact") in a Dan Brown novel. It has no basis in fact.http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=sincere
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=sincerity
~Chrisell~ Proudly Australian www.archaeochrisell.blogspot.com
vote up1vote down
What fun! Ain't read no Dan Brown - got half-way down the first page of the Code and fell asleep - but someone I'd always believed to be a totally reliable high-school English teacher is now revealed to have had feet, or maybe a toe, of clay; either that or she had a hitherto unsuspected sense of humour, all those years ago. Thanks!
vote up1vote down