|Author:||Los Hermanos Mendoza (guest, 188.8.131.52)|
|Date:||August 5, 2001 at 6:34:15 PM|
|Reply to:||Re: soccorro by Nanaea|
Isn't the literal Anglo equivalent "succor"? Not a word that's been used much 'cept for the Bible in the last coupla hundred years. It's understandable that it never developed into an English-language name.
|Because this message is archived you cannot respond to it.|
|Messages in this thread:|