View Message

<  >
Subject: Re: more on same article topic (?) - edited
Author: Chrisell   (Authenticated as Chrisell)
Date: October 19, 2004 at 12:28:19 AM
Reply to: Re: more on same article topic (?) - edited by chazda
Gah, "politically incorrect" can go jump. It might not be nice or good that, for example, Aboriginal Australians make up 2% of the population in general but make up 30% of the jailed population, but pretending that there isn't a problem because it would be "politically incorrect" to mention it isn't going to solve anything! (This is one of my pet aggravations - when I was studying, I told my grandmother that I wanted to study Historic, not Aboriginal, archaeology. "Isn't that a bit politically incorrect?" she asked. No, it's what I want to do with the rest of my life!! People use that term for the absurdest things.)

Anyway, dragging this post back on topic . . . I'm not at all surprised that they have evidence to back up their conclusion. It makes sense. Unpleasant sense, major-problem-needing-to-be-fixed sense, but still sense.

Am I coherent yet? :-))

Because this message is archived you cannot respond to it.

Messages in this thread: