Names
Introduction
Browse Names
Advanced Search
Popularity
Namesakes
Name Days
Submitted Names
Interact
Message Boards
Polls
Games and Quizzes
Predict Rankings
Submit a Name
Tools
Random Renamer
Name Translator
Meanings
Anagrams
Baby Name Expert
Surname Site
Place Name Site
Menu
Sign In
Register
Surname Site
Place Name Site
Introduction
Browse Names
Advanced Search
Popularity
Namesakes
Name Days
Submitted Names
Message Boards
Polls
Games and Quizzes
Predict Rankings
Random Renamer
Name Translator
Meanings
Anagrams
Baby Name Expert
Sign In
Register
View Message
Home
»
Message Boards
»
Tag Search
New Post
Search
Any time
Advanced
Help
This is a reply within a larger thread:
view the whole thread
[Opinions] That's because...
by
Llewella
(penguiny7)
10/12/2008, 2:10 PM
in reply to
a message by Megan
The states have people names. Not the same thing as people having state names.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
Full-text replies
▾
full-text
compact
Newest first
▾
newest
active
votes
oldest
-
Tippins
(blaaarg)
+2
10/12/2008, 4:10 PM
Seriously
Georgia
and
Carolina
were
named after people.
It is a totally different concept.
1
-
Murasaki
(lady murasaki)
10/13/2008, 10:55 AM
Exactly
And moreover,
Georgia
and
Carolina
are well established as people's names. It's dumb to use them to justify ridiculous names like Alabama. Why not Massachusetts and Wyoming, since we're at it?
1
-
Julia
(JuliaF)
10/12/2008, 9:10 PM
A-freaking-men.
1