View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

[Opinions] Re: African-American section
Kit this is borderline racist. Honestly. The names are labeled AA because most people using them are African-American. There are also names used mostly with white Americans and I’d be fine with calling them “European American.”*previously posted as summitseeker*
--hike more / worry less--
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

No, I am not being racist. Thank you for assuming that. Second of all, go make a European American section then. The reason for my comment earlier is because I am tired of people being put in boxes. "Oh, why do you have a white girl name?" These names are stereotypes. I'm tired of hearing that my name sounds "white" and I should have a name like Shaniqua just because I'm black.
vote up1
So let's say an American of European descent, for some reason, is given the name Guillaume. People are surprised when they meet him because few American boys have French names. Some people ask him, "Why do you have a French name?"Does that mean people are being put into boxes or that a French boy having a French name is just a stereotype or that there shouldn't be a French name category on BtN?
vote up1
*sigh* How does this have anything to do with what I said?
vote up1
You objected to being asked why you have a "white girl" name. You seem to think that being asked that is denigrating to your race, culture, and name. But it's not more so than an American being asked why he has a French name is denigrating to either French or American culture. It's just not what people expect.
vote up1
"It's not just what people expect."
People expecting or not expecting is not an excuse. Why I have my name is none of their business.
vote up1
I didn't say it was an excuse or any of their business. "Why do you have this name?" can be considered rude under any circumstances. I was only pointing out that the reason behind the question is more innocent than you think, even if it's rude to ask the question.
vote up1
Bottom line, they should mind their business. I honestly don't know why you think you should defend them when you didn't know what they were thinking at the time. Did you know if it was "innocent" or not? No, because you weren't there.
vote up1
And did you ask them why they said what they did, and did they answer, "Because I'm a racist and I like to put people in boxes and make stereotypes out of them"? If not, then you are assuming.The context in which you brought it up made it clear that you thought it was denigrating to you to be asked that question, and my point was simply that it is not necessarily so.
vote up1
THAT.DOES.NOT.EXCUSE.WHAT.THEY.SAID. Is that clear enough for you? Case closed.
vote up1
THAT. IS. NOT. THE. POINT. Is that clear to you? The point is what motivated you to bring it up.
vote up1
Motivated me. Lol. Are you a psychologist or something?
vote up1
Oh I forgot. Only those with Ph.Ds are familiar with the word "motivate".
vote up1
That's not the point, genius. The point is that you are trying to read my mind. I'm sure this is news to you: you are not a mind reader. You are not a white knight either.
vote up1
I don't need to be a mind reader. You said yourself why you brought it up. Because you think that when people ask the question, they are thinking in stereotypes and putting people in boxes. I don't agree that that is necessarily the case.
vote up1
Having an "African-American" section isn't saying "African Americans can ONLY USE THESE!", it's saying "You're more likely to find these names on an African-American person"-- it's a usage category. It'd be surprising to meet a white woman named Nikeisha; it wouldn't be surprising on a black woman because Nikeisha is an African American name.It's just like, it'd be surprising to meet a black woman, or a white woman, named Junko. It wouldn't be surprising to meet a Japanese woman named Junko, because it's a Japanese name. That's why it's listed as Japanese on this site. I'm sorry people in your life don't grasp that, but we're not the ones you should be mad at.
vote up1
What do you want?
vote up1
Just put the names in the American section. There's no need to attach African to it, when they have no connection to Africa. Africa has nothing to do with these names.

This message was edited 6/19/2018, 1:29 PM

vote up1
Africa has something to do with these names. They are part of a naming culture that was created by descendants of people who were brought as slaves from Africa. Today, because they are descended predominately from Africans, these people are called African-American, hence the names of their culture are called African-American.Right now, names used mainly by European-Americans aren't categorized separately because European-Americans are the dominant group, both politically and numerically. That could change some day.
vote up1
French names are from France because they are from the French language. Spanish namea are from Spain because they are from the Spanish language. Which African language does, say Deshawn, come from? Swahili, Yoruba, Zulu?
vote up1
That doesn't matter. It doesn't matter whether or not the names come from African languages. They were created by African-Americans, that's why they are called African-American names. They are not called African names, they are called African-American names. If African-Americans were called, instead, Blue Beanies, then these names would be called Blue Beanie names.
vote up1
Again, the term Black American names could be used.
vote up1
Except that for the fact that African-Americans, after being called "Negro" and "Colored" and then "Black" have now decided (most of them) that they want to be called African-Americans.Fess up, you never cared that the names don't come from Africa. You were hurt by the racism that the names elicited, and your reaction was to deny that the names exist as a category. You're not the first person to do this and you won't be the last. There's no shame in having things explained to you, you don't have to change the subject to save face.
vote up1
If that's what you want to believe, okay then. You're telling me to confess what I didn't believe in the first place. You assume a lot of things.
vote up1
It's weird how you think erasure will solve racism.
vote up1
Where did I write that "Hey delete this because I think it will solve racism!" You are just jumping to your own conclusions. I just don't think it should be associated with Africa,that's all.

This message was edited 6/19/2018, 1:51 PM

vote up1
I really do understand your concern, seeing racist comments sucks. I have been on this site for a long time and they have always been here, long before African-American was a category. You’ve created a correlation in your head that people seeing the category as “African American” is making them say racist crap. Unfortunately, they would anyway.Would you feel better about the category being called “Black American”? Because these names definitely deserve their own category just as any other culture does, and your harping on the word Africa doesn’t really make sense to me, so I’m wondering if you think changing the terminology would be better.
vote up1
That's cool. I just wanted to voice my opinion, that's all. I wasn't really looking for someone to change it. Rachel Shaina just assumed it.
vote up1
Quote I wasn't really looking for someone to change it.

QuoteThere is no need for the African-American section to exist.There's already an American section. Why don't you just put it there?
vote up1
That's because you asked me what I wanted. I was just stating my opinion, but you assumed that I wanted something else. You were pushing for something eles, so I answered your question.

This message was edited 6/19/2018, 3:06 PM

vote up1
When I say "What do you want", you could say "I just want to state my opinion!" "I just want to be angry for no reason!" Don't pin dumb nonsense on me.
vote up1
Actually, you are getting angry with me. I was just voicing my opinion, but you interpreted it as anger. Sorry you thought that.
vote up1
Why.....shouldn't they be associated with Africa?

This message was edited 6/19/2018, 2:25 PM

vote up1
Because the names are not from African names(maybe except Shaniqua). All the rest are just prefixes added to Russian, French, Spanish, etc. names. You don't have to agree with me. That's just my opinion.
vote up1
No one ever said African-American names are "from" African names.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African-American_names
QuoteAfrican-American names are an integral part of the traditions of the African-American community. While many Black Americans use names that are popular with wider American culture, a number of specific naming trends have emerged within African-American culture. Many use their own or their children's names as a symbol of solidarity within their culture. Sources of names include French names, Arabic names, Muslim names, as well as other European and Biblical names.
vote up1
They could always be called Black American names. Calling them African-American implies that they are associated with Africa. But of course you don't have to do anything about it. I really didn't think that you would think that.
vote up1
You'd better take this up with the African-Americans, all 37, 144, 350 of them.Sometimes white Americans are called European-Americans, and I've never heard a European holler about it.I think, because you're not African-American, that you don't get a say in what they are called and what their names are called.
vote up1
Slapping a prefix onto a French name does not change the history of the name. I'm not talking about African-Americans being called African-Americans, I'm talking about names like Lashawn being called African-American names
vote up1
I know you are, and it's been explained over and over to you why it's irrelevant whether or not the names come from Africa.Basically, you don't like the term "African-American" applied to these names because you feel that the racism that European-Americans show towards African-Americans splashes over onto you as an African.And the answer to that is still to attack the racism and not the name of the race. The racism is the problem, the name of the race is not.
vote up1
Kitandkat said she is black?
https://www.behindthename.com/bb/baby/4938856

This message was edited 6/19/2018, 3:50 PM

vote up1
She's now saying she is African, so I took that to mean African, not African-American.
vote up1
Lol, what do you mean now? When did I ever say that I was African-American? Lemme guess, you assumed that didn't you?
vote up1
No, earlier I assumed nothing. You just said you were black. That could mean African, African-American, or a person of African descent living anywhere in the world. I didn't know. Then later, i.e,. "now", you said "African", and I took that to mean not African-American, because if you were, you'd say, "African-American".

This message was edited 6/19/2018, 4:45 PM

vote up1
Obviously you didn't read the post. Go read it again. I say African as well.
vote up1
No, I am not being racist. Thank you for assuming that. Second of all, go make a European American section then. The reason for my comment earlier is because I am tired of people being put in boxes. "Oh, why do you have a white girl name?" These names are stereotypes. I'm tired of hearing that my name sounds "white" and I should have a name like Shaniqua just because I'm black.No, you don't.
vote up1
Okay, I don't. What's your point exactly?
vote up1

This message was edited 6/19/2018, 2:25 PM

vote up1