View Message

Julian
The search continues for the name of Peter's baby brother who will arrive in February. Lately, we have been considering Julian. What is your opinion of the name? Any associations with this name? I have read that some people consider it feminine sounding, but I don't. However, if you do, please speak up. Also, what is your opinion of Peter and Julian as brothers? Thanks.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

I really like the name Julian and don't think it sounds feminine, although I know people who do think so, my mother being such a person. However, I don't feel it goes well with Peter. To me Peter and Julian are totally different styles.
vote up1
Do you have any suggestions?Do you have any suggestions for names with a style similar to Peter? (without it sounding a like a recitation of the bible when said with Peter)
vote up1
I love Julian!!! It is very soft & sweet sounding but also sophisticated, romantic & current. Peter, to me, is a little dated & boring. While Julian is fresh but still with history.
I do think they work really good together though because Peter is also a soft sounding name to me.
vote up1
I like Julian. It does have a slightly more feminine vibe to it than some names, however. To me, it has an artistic, intellectual feel. On the flip side, it does have an almost effete feel, though.I do associate it with Julian Lennon.Julian and Peter are quite different names, IMO. But that is not necessarily a bad thing.
vote up1
Nice choice. It's a good solid intelligent name, and goes very well with Peter. My parents considered it for me before I was born, and had I been a boy I'd have been happy with it.
vote up1
I think Julian is lovely. It seems strong and masculine to me and quite regal too. I think Peter and Julian would make a gorgeous sib set, of two classic names.
vote up1
Peter and Julian would make good brothers. Julian is good because it's "normal" without being common or boring. The only association I have is someone from a chapter book for little kids... it was some series about two brothers, and one of them was named Julian.
vote up1
Julian isn't the most masculine sounding name out there, but I wouldn't say that it's too effeminate. I guess I'd say that it's basically unisex sounding, but not too girly. Julius and Jules are familiar names for boys, Julia and Juliana are familiar for girls, and there are common names for boys and girls that both end in -ian, so it doesn't strike me as strongly one gender or the other even though I wouldn't recommend using Julian for a girl. When I see the name Julian, I assume that the bearer of the name is male because it's used almost exclusively for boys.Peter and Julian could work for brothers, but they don't seem like they're the same style to me. Sibling names don't have to necessarily be the same style though.
vote up1
I love Julian. My dh used to think it was a bit soft until recently. Now, he loves it as much as I do (thanks to Julian Assange, wikileaks). BTW, of all the names you've brought up so far, I think Julian is the best complement to Peter. Perfect!

This message was edited 11/28/2010, 3:27 PM

vote up1
I am not going to bash! I like Julian! I think it's the best of the bunch! It's a handsome name.My only real association is Julian Lennon, and that's a pretty neutral one for me.Julian, while not a macho he-man name, is not too effeminate, either.
vote up1
Wow! No bashing? Just kidding. Thanks for the comment.
vote up1
We considered that for our son too. (It's amusing me, how some of the names you're considering are ones we seriously considered too. I wonder if you'll end up mentioning my son's actual name =) He had a cousin born when I was about 6 months pregnant, though, who got named Julian. So ... I crossed it right off the list. It annoyed me to be the second one to use it, so soon after the first.I don't think it's feminine sounding per se. I do think that if the bearer is not very masculine, it can seem less masculine. If the bearer is very masculine, the name seems very masculine. I think it has a certain amount of drama about it, dunno if that makes any sense. I don't mean like theatrical, just that it's resonant ... *sigh* I sound like an idiot. It's the reason I love the name Julia so much. I can't really explain it. I think both Julian and Julia are powerful names, what I call "power names" - but Julia on a girl seems less complex, more predictable, than Julian on a boy does. I don't think I would have ended up using it, just because I love Julia so much that I would've felt like I was only using Julian to satisfy my desire to use Julia (which was also thwarted, by a close friend using it just before my daughter was born!). But I do think Julian is a good name, and masculine.I think it goes great with Peter.

This message was edited 11/28/2010, 2:22 PM

vote up1
I think you make alot of sense. Since we seem to share an appreciation for similar names, do you mind sharing your son's name? I'm curious.
vote up1
I pm'ed you.f
vote up1
Peter and Julian are wonderful, separately and together. I like the fact that they're not quite the same style. I don't consider Julian feminine at all; in fact, I think of it as quite handsome.
vote up1
I love Julian. I think it's handsome and dignified.I think Peter and Julian sound like brothers.
vote up1
It's a favorite here.It's very cute and hip. Peter and Julian are great as brothers, although I still prefer Peter & Conrad.
vote up1
Julian is very handsome, distinguished, and intellectual. It doesn't sound at all feminine to me. Peter and Julian would be a very dignified sibset.
vote up1
Thanks for the comment. I had not thought of them as dignified, but I like that description!
vote up1
I love it and I wouldn't call it feminine at all!
Peter and Julian isn't the same style, but that doesn't have to be bad :) They are, after all, individuals.
vote up1
That's how I feel about Peter and Julian as a sibset--they are different styles but not so different that they should not be used together.
vote up1