New Post
Search
HelpRe: Declan?
in reply to a message by armyofbono
"People tend to comment more on posts with more names."
About that, I put up a post a week or so ago with a really long list of names, yet I only got a few responses. So, I don't think there's a correlation between how many first names you put up and how many responses you get from your post.
~I luv London Tipton 'cause she's an idiot like moi~
My pinool: http://www.behindthename.com/pnl/149249
About that, I put up a post a week or so ago with a really long list of names, yet I only got a few responses. So, I don't think there's a correlation between how many first names you put up and how many responses you get from your post.
~I luv London Tipton 'cause she's an idiot like moi~
My pinool: http://www.behindthename.com/pnl/149249
This message was edited 2/21/2015, 9:11 AM
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1
Replies
You have to get the right balance. A long list of names can be a lot to process and people don't always have the energy for that.
1
All about balance, agreed!
1
^This. The posts with five to ten names always get more responses than the posts with, say, thirty or forty names.
1
Yeah, I think if you generally stay under 10 names, people are more likely to respond. I know if I see a really long list, I just pass it over because I feel like I need to comment on everyone and I don't have the energy.
1