View Message

New Post
Search
Help
[Facts] Re: Generational naming
by Llewella (penguiny7)
6/25/2009, 1:28 PM
in reply to a message by Dearie
You're right, technically he should be a Jr., but to my understanding using II is for if you skip a generation or name after an uncle or something. So II still is correct I guess, as he is the second Patrick Caleb Shields. It's just weird.

This message was edited 6/25/2009, 1:29 PM

Reply
vote up1vote down

Messages

Generational naming  ·  Dearie  ·  6/25/2009, 10:22 AM
•Re: Generational naming  ·  Guinevere  ·  6/26/2009, 6:19 PM
•Re: Generational naming  ·  Cleveland Kent Evans  ·  6/25/2009, 4:19 PM
•Re: Generational naming  ·  namebug  ·  6/25/2009, 3:09 PM
•Re: Generational naming  ·  Llewella  ·  6/25/2009, 1:28 PM