View Message

I think it should be a nn I always think of "her name was Lola she wa s a showgirl" thing...maybe as a nn for Lourdes? I really don't know! :(

---

~* In Memory of*~: Elizabeth & Abigail Ramierez.

---

"We all go a little mad sometimes" - Norman Bates in Psycho

I actually really like this name. Lola. It makes me picture a 1920's glamour woman. But it could also work well nowadays. I prefer it as a full name, and not a nickname. That's just unnecessary, I think.

Lola is short for Delores, Lolita or Lourdes. I think Lola is fine as a fn. I don't like Delores too much. I actually think Lolita is really pretty, but then you have the sexual connotation. that may take a few more generation before that rubs off. too bad.

---

but Lola on its own is a great name. I agree with Helena, it is very glamourous.

This is my mother-in-law's name. I've never known anyone with this name before. I like it. Unusual but something most people would have heard of.

It's cute. I think it's nice as a full name. :)

---

-- Sarah

I like this name and I prefer it as a full name.

I like it, I always have. But you should know that it's the Tagalog word for "grandmother". ;-)

---

-the warrior girl and her dragon lover-

I think it should deffinatley only be a nickname, rather than a given name. My daughter is London Eloise, and we call her Lola about 50% of the time. I think it can also be a nickname for Louise, Lourdes and pretty much any name beginning with Lo-. Lolita, ofcourse, being the most obvious one.

No, it's too cutesy as a full name. Lola can be a nickname for Delores but I think it could work as a nickname for Penelope as well.

Well, I think it's just fine on it's own, but if you want it to be short for something, there Lolita, Lolicia and Liliola.

---