View Message

Have you seen the new Duggar family?
There's a new show now about the Willis family. They're a family of musicians living in Nashville with 12 kids, and all the kids' names start with...J. They range in age from 23 to 4:
Jessica Jane
Jeremiah Scott "Jair"
Jennifer Elizabeth "Jenny"
Jeanette Lynn "Jet"
Jackson Scott "Jack"
Jedidiah Scott "Jedi"
Jasmine Katerina "Jazz Kat"
Juliette Rose "Julie"
Jamie Christine
Joy Anna (looks like she goes by both names)
Jaeger Scott
Jada Marie Parents are Toby (I'm taking a wild guess his mn is Scott) and Brenda
-------------------
Love my little sparrow, Caemlyn Sparrow Gail; my Hucklebaby, David Royce Huckleberry "Huck"; and my Rain, forever in my heart
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Hey, they're almost all pretty good! The only bad one is Jaeger. I don't really like Jada, or Jamie for a girl, but at least they're not contrived or misspelled. I've never cared much for Jennifer, but the rest I like.
vote up1
Because one Duggar damily wasn't enough, right... And if you have one billion kids it makes perfect sense to give them names all starting with the same initial, god forbid there is some individuality left in them. AnywayJessica Jane like Jessica, wouldn't pair it with Jane
Jeremiah Scott "Jair" nice
Jennifer Elizabeth "Jenny" super boring
Jeanette Lynn "Jet" meh. bland
Jackson Scott "Jack"nice
Jedidiah Scott "Jedi"don't like it, plus what's with 3 kids with the same mn
Jasmine Katerina "Jazz Kat"nice names, combo doesn't flow so well
Juliette Rose "Julie" Juliette is nice, Rose is fillerish
Jamie Christine ok
Joy Anna (looks like she goes by both names)
Jaeger Scott 4 Scotts?? wtf? really don't like Jaeger
Jada Marie okA lot of the combos feel odd, with rhymes or repated sounds.
vote up1
I just always wondered how a random quiverfull family is chosen and how they get a show. They are many of them.
vote up1
The ad for the show shows them on America's Got Talent.
vote up1
Okay, makes sense and like I posted in the link below they were involved in something too.
vote up1
My goodness, if I'd known that coming up with three different middle names for three boys after Jeremiah Scott was going to overwhelm them so much I would have offered to drop some names in a hat and pull three out.
vote up1
Looks like they're ripping off the Duggars...
vote up1
This types of shows/families annoy me like crazy, but I'm going to forget that for a minute and just worry about the names.Jessica Jane - kind of fun with the alliteration
Jeremiah Scott - meh, Jeremiah doesn't do it for me at all
Jennifer Elizabeth bores the heck out of me
Jeanette Lynn - not a fan
Jackson Scott - the flow is terrible. I used to like JAckson until I started hearing it too much ad until it started getting x's in it.
Jedidiah Scott - Jedidiah seems like a bit of a joke name to me
Jasmine Katerina - I hate Jasmine, but KAterina is great
Juliette Rose - fine
Jamie Christine - boring
Joy Anna - Ooo, I want this to be hyphenated. Cute.
Jaeger Scott - yuck
Jada Marie - not a fan
vote up1
Don't these people have ANY imagination?Seriously, another large family with all J names? Why? What is the great infatuation with this letter?Also...I'm getting tired of all these Duggar-type families who have no other claim to fame than spitting out a new kid every nine months. Why is this entertaining? I didn't watch the Duggars' show, and I won't be watching this one, but I honestly don't understand how people are entertained by this. Could someone explain it to me? There is no story, there is nothing at stake, I just don't get it. Maybe it's because I have never been fascinated with babies or birth in general, but just...WHY?
vote up1
I haven't read any of the other responses to your question yet, so I don't know whether or not I'm repeating anything. But I think the reason that people are fascinated by the Duggars is that there is a part of a lot of people who would like to do what the Duggars have done. Say to heck with it with birth control, to heck with manipulating our bodies so we don't do what nature intended us to do, have as many children as nature dictates, name them all, love them all, have a lot of grown children when they're old, and many, many descendants. It's what people used to commonly, routinely do.And it's what few do any longer, and few feel that they can do. There are reasons for this, but I'm convinced that concern about overpopulation is a reason for very few. It's the fact that children cost more money than they used to, it's the overemphasis on education, which brings all kinds of headaches, it's the helicopter parenting and the fact that parents who don't helicopter their children are likely to become targets of a CPS investigation, it's the lack of domestic help. I know there's a part of me that would have liked to say "The heck with it" and I will always wonder what the children that I didn't have because I had to limit myself to two for the above reasons would have been like. A part of me that will always envy my mother because she had five children and not just two.A family who does this in this day and age in spite of all the reasons there are not to, and seems to make it work, and seems to be happy, I can understand why they are a source of interest.
vote up1
I find them fascinating just because I wonder how such a large family can function well. Like, with all those kids how do they keep any sense of order and "family"-ness and how do they all live under the same roof and manage their house with all those little kids running around messing it up? That kind of stuff.

This message was edited 5/14/2015, 8:15 AM

vote up1
I have no idea either, but then again I really don't like any reality shows. They are so boring to me. I just don't get the appeal.
vote up1
itajust don't get it
vote up1
I think the mega-family genre of reality tv is like our politically correct version of the Victorian freak show. We can't look at people who are horribly deformed for entertainment any more - but we can gawk at the spectacle of weirdo procreation-frenzied families. Sometimes with added religion wackiness! It's fun for everyone!I don't know, I don't watch them either, so I also don't get it.
vote up1
The question is, why are people who do what humankind evolved to do, without resorting to unnatural means to avoid doing it, considered "weirdo"?

This message was edited 5/16/2015, 7:38 AM

vote up1
Came for the names, stayed for the seedy underbelly of their religious cult
vote up1
Yeah I once so a conference paper on the Duggars and the success of the show was attributed to the "freakiness" of Michelle's constantly pregnant body.
vote up1
Speaking of Michelle, WHEN is she ever going to change her hair? It's so dated, I can't see HOW she thinks it looks good.

This message was edited 5/14/2015, 8:17 AM

vote up1
She got a makeover once on the show (bad television is what I did homework by in college) and Jim Bob didn't like her new hair so she let it grow back out.
vote up1
I don't watch them either, but my mom and sister do. There's a part of me that likes that there's a tv show out there that's popular and doesn't have to rely on sex, drugs, and/ out of control lifestyles to get fans. But then, it's just another reality show, and formulaic in its own way.
vote up1
Oh, but it does rely on sex. Lots and lots of sex. But I know what you mean, so I'll stop being a douche about it.
vote up1
hahahaI had the exact same thought, but was too lazy to write it
vote up1
But couldn't you have something which is neither on sex and drugs NOR on people spouting one kid after the other (and often having dodgy ideologies on their own right?)
vote up1
It would be nice, but if you look at what's big on tv, there doesn't seem to be a lot of family friendly stuff outside of Disney/ Nickelodeon. But even most of that is for kids, not the whole family.
vote up1
EXACTLY thisI also don't care about watching them, but my mom and sister (and gramma) are fans of the Duggars. I think they're good people, I just don't care to watch their lives.Another family with pretty much the same "dynamic" as the Duggars, down to the J naming, though? That just seems excessive and copycattish...
vote up1
I compared this new family to the Von Trapps when I talked to my sister one day. Large musical family that performs. I guess a cross between the two.
vote up1
That is so true!
vote up1
This is straying way off topic but I remember my family having a discussion a couple year ago about how networks like TLC are basically modern day versions of freak shows. There's programs about conjoined twins, little people, morbidly obese people, people with strange disorders and diseases etc etc I don't think our society is as far removed from looking at people with disabilities as entertainment as we like to think we are.
vote up1
You are so right! Now I'm gonna have a hard time thinking of TLC as anything other than the "freak show" channel. =X
vote up1
I'm with you on the "why is this entertaining". I really really hope people are not having kids just for the fame of it. Maybe I'm really judgemental, but I have a bit of a hard time convincing myself that is not the case.
vote up1
Nope and don't plan to. I don't keep up with shows like that because the way I see it, in today's time, theres absolutely no reason for a woman to birth that many children.
My grandparents raised 13 kids but that was before birth control and all that stuff. It doesn't really pay to have a large family because with my personal expirences, my mom may as well of only had a few siblings.
I considerly hope people aren't having these large families or even multiples just for the sake of fame. Good grief...
12 kids are of course better than having 19 or 20 kids (I honestly don't think I want to know the actual number of kids Michelle Digger has. It will just scare me)The names are very nice. I give them credit for that at least. Not a huge fan of Katerina, Jamie (prefer for boy), Joy, Jaeger and Jada.
Toby and Brenda are just ok namesIf I ever birthed that many kids (and I promise you that won't happen) I wouldnt have them start all with the same letter or have them be irritatingly rhymy like with my mom and her siblings.
vote up1
Great Scott!Yeah... I am going to say your wild guess is more like a sturdy limb on the Scott front. Can't say I know much about the Duggars (though I did learn recently that they are NOT Mormon, and I was honestly surprised) and will likely not be interested in the Willis'. However, there are some decent combos listed. Juliette Rose is quite pretty, and I have always had a soft spot for Jasmine and Joy. Overall, not a fan of this naming style. Also think that they are mismatched even with the J-names. They clearly went with an obscure biblical theme for the boys at first, borderline Amish. But they went trendy and mainstream for the girls at first. Then they threw in Jaeger, which makes no sense at all to the style and apparent religious view. I also want to point out that their nicknames border on 80s popstar vibes.
vote up1