|Subject:||Re: Hubert originally a short form of Hugobert?|
|Author:||Miranda (Authenticated as Randee15)|
|Date:||June 4, 2005 at 12:24:51 PM|
|Reply to:||Hubert originally a short form of Hugobert? by Lucille|
Hubert could indeed be a contraction of Hugobert that later came to be used as the normal form (remember, there are over 1,500 years in which names like Hugobert were common; that's a lot of time for evolution, needless to say). Hubert could've originally been a nn, but I think it's rather impossible to tell.
But I actually think that it's rather more likely that Hugobert was a rare "learned" lengthening of Hubert, since my reliable sources (BtN, A Dictionary of First Names by the Oxford Press, Oxygen.com's Babynamer) don't mention Hugobert in their entries about Hubert at all.
Proud adopter of 15 punctuation marks; see my profile for their names.
|Because this message is archived you cannot respond to it.|
|Messages in this thread:|