View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted
It's notoriously unreliable, and nobody should go there if they want accurate, etymologically-based meanings. Thus, what I said was perfectly factual.EDIT: - extra "was", two days after the fact...

Miranda
"You've been downgraded to a class three tropical storm." -- My mother to my father, re: Hurricane DennisProud adopter of 15 punctuation marks; see my profile for their names.

This message was edited 8/1/2005, 2:52 PM

vote up1vote down

Replies

Yeah I never have found them to even have a very large data base at all.---------------------------------------------------------------------
My Favorite Names:Girls: Sabriel, Serafina, Augustine, Ravenna, Leona, Iona, Fiona, Quintessa, Arianna, Adele (ah-dhe-LEE), Gwenivere, Genevieve, Kathryn, Katerina, Shilia, Catriona, and Keira.Boys: Keiran, Quinn, Aidan, Vincent, Caden, Killian, Lochlan, Cleon, Xavier, Finley, and Malachi.
vote up1vote down
It's not so much that their database is small, as that they invent and change meanings whenever they choose. They don't care if it's accurate as long as it's "cute".
ChrisellAll we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us. - J.R.R. Tolkien.

vote up1vote down
I think his point is that there are less inflamatory ways to describe the site.
vote up2vote down
Precisely. It is fine to criticize their accuracy, but "crap" is not a word that should be used on a site like this one where people are supposed to be discussing names from an intellectual perspective.
vote up2vote down