Behind the Name: Message: "No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted"

< >

Subject:	No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted
Author:	Miranda (Authenticated as Randee15)
Date:	July 29, 2005 at 2:52:18 PM
Reply to:	Re: Also: Babynames.com is crap when it comes to accurate meanings. nt by Cleveland Kent Evans

It's notoriously unreliable, and nobody should go there if they want accurate, etymologically-based meanings. Thus, what I said was perfectly factual.

EDIT: - extra "was", two days after the fact...

Miranda
"You've been downgraded to a class three tropical storm." -- My mother to my father, re: Hurricane Dennis

Proud adopter of 15 punctuation marks; see my profile for their names.

This message was edited by the author on August 1, 2005 at 2:52:40 PM

Because this message is archived you cannot respond to it.

Messages in this thread:

azriel and zariel - Brittany Smith Jul 28 2005, 8:02:42 PM
- Re: azriel and zariel - Miss Claire Jul 29 2005, 8:00:02 AM
- Re: azriel and zariel - Chrisell Jul 28 2005, 8:12:24 PM
  - Also: Babynames.com is crap when it comes to accurate meanings. nt - Miranda Jul 28 2005, 11:58:08 PM
    - Re: Also: Babynames.com is crap when it comes to accurate meanings. nt - Cleveland Kent Evans Jul 29 2005, 10:38:53 AM
      - No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted - Miranda Jul 29 2005, 2:52:18 PM
        
        Re: No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted - Serafina Starstrider Jul 29 2005, 7:20:01 PM
        
        Re: No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted - Chrisell Jul 29 2005, 7:23:07 PM
        
        Re: No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted - Mike C Aug 2 2005, 11:42:20 AM
        
        Re: No, it's fact that Babynames.com isn't to be trusted - Cleveland Kent Evans Aug 6 2005, 8:30:32 AM

View Message