|Author:||Chrisell (Authenticated as Chrisell)|
|Date:||October 20, 2006 at 11:25:14 PM|
|Reply to:||Hayley by mum2bubba|
It's probably ok to consider it a nature name - I don't see why not. Most names that people think of as "nature names" tend to be word names (Rose, Ivy, Stone, Canyon, Rowan etc), but there's no rule that says that they have to be still-used words.
This message was edited by the author on October 20, 2006 at 11:25:25 PM
|Because this message is archived you cannot respond to it.|
|Messages in this thread:|