Message: "As a MN? Sure, why not?"

[Opinions] As a MN? Sure, why not?

by Clippy

3/18/2008, 4:25 PM

I think Gale would probably work better, but I think Gail's fairly harmless and ambiguous enough to not appear too feminine on a boy.

Gail on a boy? · khaotickharma · 3/18/2008, 3:26 PM

•Re: Gail on a boy? · Cambria · 3/19/2008, 8:00 AM

•never in a million years · -=A=- · 3/19/2008, 7:50 AM

•Re: Gail on a boy? · Isla · 3/18/2008, 10:41 PM

•Re: Gail on a boy? · Dot · 3/18/2008, 6:10 PM

•Re: Gail on a boy? · Andrew · 3/18/2008, 6:07 PM

•As a MN? Sure, why not? · Clippy · 3/18/2008, 4:25 PM

•Re: Gail on a boy? · Cati · 3/18/2008, 4:17 PM

•Re: Gail on a boy? · GasolineAllie · 3/18/2008, 4:05 PM

•Re: Gail on a boy? · Megan · 3/18/2008, 4:02 PM

•Re: Gail on a boy? · Phoenix-san · 3/18/2008, 4:00 PM

•brutal · -=A=- · 3/18/2008, 3:47 PM

•Re: Gail on a boy? · Kate · 3/18/2008, 3:44 PM

•yes [m] · Sabrina Fair · 3/18/2008, 3:27 PM

View Message