View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

Re:
My main point, though, which I realize I didn't make clear, is that when I ask specifically not to bring me down and a response is "omg"...That IS offensive. Just the implications of it. Puck didn't like the name either, but it wasn't expressed as "omg." That response I essentially dismissed, not because it had not value, but because it didn't answer my question. Compare it to asking which spelling one prefers, Ann or Anne. If a response is "I don't like the name," doesn't really answer the question or offer any help. The person isn't asking for opinions on the name Anne, but asking a specific question. But a response of "Omg" and whatever followed would just be, I don't know, disrespectful I guess. -------------------
Love my little sparrow, Caemlyn Sparrow Gail, and my Hucklebaby, David Royce Huckleberry "Huck"
-------------------
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Re:Oh. It seemed to me that the "omg" wasn't in shock about the name, but in surprised dismay at having suddenly noticed, as an afterthought, a potential for teasing. The "omg" wouldn't have made sense without the edit. Go ahead and read what she put. It's not hurtful. Maybe you will feel less hurt.I think that you're not the only person I've seen post asking for opinions on a potential babyname, who feels as though the responses are sort of personal. I guess that is legit - I think it's expected, and people are generally nice about it. I even thought Anneza was being extra nice. Puck sounded more judgmental than Anneza by far, IMHO. "Your child is not God" - as if you thought that?? As if naming your child Hosanna implies you think the child is God? Hm. Whatever. lol. Anyway, it's still not personal, yay.Btw I like Rain. =) not that you ought to care what I think.
vote up1
ThanksOk. Thanks for that. I will read it, then. I appreciate it.
vote up1