New Post
Search
HelpRe: Lennon, Harrison and...
in reply to a message by Crista
Harrison and McCartney are not all that bad for boys. They could be called Harry and Mac. I find Lennon atrocious for a girl, but there are so many surnames being used on girls these days, that I don't think anyone will bat an eye. I don't think that anyone will even assume it's for John Lennon until and unless they learn her brothers' names.
Now Ringo would be bad.
But really I have to add. I like the Beatles as much as the next person. Probably more than most younger people do. I like their music. I have never cared one whit about them as persons. I don't even think that Lennon was the saint that he is made out to be. What did they do? They were talented songwriters and musicians, that much is undeniable. That's all that anyone who didn't know them personally can say. Is that enough to name a child for? I don't think so.
Now Ringo would be bad.
But really I have to add. I like the Beatles as much as the next person. Probably more than most younger people do. I like their music. I have never cared one whit about them as persons. I don't even think that Lennon was the saint that he is made out to be. What did they do? They were talented songwriters and musicians, that much is undeniable. That's all that anyone who didn't know them personally can say. Is that enough to name a child for? I don't think so.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
1