View Message

This is a reply within a larger thread: view the whole thread

Re: James on Girls
in reply to a message by LMS
Geez, no. James is a classic boy's name to me, and the thought of it trending for girls is actually kind of sad. I might like to use it on a future son some day to honor my brother, but by the time that comes, it might already be thought of as "unisex." Gah. Hopefully it'll pass soon.
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Quoteby the time that comes, it might already be thought of as "unisex."
It's funny; an online friend/acquaintance actually predicted this some time ago. At the time, I didn't believe it would happen, but now...
vote up1