View Message

Kelsey vs. Chelsea
Which one do you choose, and why? **After supposedly dying on January 30, 2007 after eating tainted pancakes, she returned several times as an angel and was revealed to be alive on May 17, 2011. )**
Archived Thread - replies disabled
vote up1

Replies

Chelsea. I don’t like Kelsey.
vote up1
Kelsey! I went to high school with a Chelsea, and... idk, she just gave me kind of a "meh" vibe. So, Kelsey it is!
vote up1
vote up1
I was literally thinking of this yesterday! At the moment I'm more drawn to Kelsey, and I think overall at any time I'm more drawn to Kelsey. Chelsea is cute, but it lacks a little something. Kelsey is the next level up.
vote up1
Chelsea. To me it has a really fun retro seafoam-and-peach soul. "Chels" is cute.
vote up1
Kelsey seems cooler. Easier to say, and brighter. Less dated imo (less popular). Chelsea feels to me like it's trying a little, to evoke something - like Tiffany, Brittany, Courtney, Harper - while Kelsey is just a trendy name that doesn't apologize for being one. Like Kelly or Avery.
Chelsea seems more "could be unisex!!" but not really, hardly anyone really ever wanted to name boys it. Kelsey seems more actually unisex - started as a guy name - but with feminine appeal when it's on a gal, like Lindsay or Taylor could have.
Chelsea is like a bomber jacket in one of those "baroque" colorful prints with gold chains; Kelsey is like a light-wash denim jacket with appliques.
But I like Chelsea alright. Not knocking it.
vote up1
Chelsea, since it's a favorite.I don't like Kelsey, at all.
vote up2
Chelsea, sounds lovely and a pretty name
vote up1
KelseyHere Chelsea is part of London and a football club, no thank you!I would shorten Kelsey to Kelly or Kel.
vote up2