View Message

If you had to
Give your daughter an occupational surname as a first name (ex Miller, Sawyer, Parker) what would you pick?http://www.behindthename.com/pnl/87410
vote up2

Replies

I like Schuyler but only on a boy.
So probably Miller, so I could call her Millie 100% of the time.Maybe Bailey.Idk, this is really not my style of naming.
vote up1
Technically, Kay is an occupational surname (for someone who worked near a wharf), but that's boring. I won't do that.I'd go with Archer or Knight - traditional masculine occupations which would be cool on a girl, I guess? Also Archer would make sense if she was a Sagittarius and I put any credence in astrology. And if Knight had a dark and edgy phase, I'm sure she'd appreciate her name being homonymous with Night.Actually scratch that. I'd go with Sargent, for John Singer Sargent, probably my favourite painter.
vote up1
A few of these I'm quite fond of:Palmer (does this count? not sure if 'pilgrim' is really an occupation)
Mercer
Chase
Gardner
Knight
vote up1
There is 4S today:
Scarlett
Schuyler
Saylor
SumnerIf Scarlett isn't allowed, I'd choose Schuyler.

This message was edited 10/10/2023, 4:27 PM

vote up1
For my hypothetical daughter, I would choose either Dean (church official) or Ryan (little king). I don't like any of the traditional feminine names that fit this criteria.
vote up1
If Sage counts then I'd pick that, but it would be for the plant and not as an occupation. Also not sure if it's a surname. Harper or Piper might be my pick, although I prefer them for boys. I knew a girl named Chandler and I think it sounds girly enough, but I wouldn't use it. Cordell on a girl could be called Cora, Cori, or Della. Garnet with BtN's 2nd definition would work. I could see Neely or Neilly on a girl. Heilyn could totally pass as an English girl name, not a surname though.
vote up1
The only occupation name I find acceptable for girls are Scarlett, Sage and maybe Bailey. The rest are too mannish.
vote up3
Taylor, Paige, Harper in that orderI'd choose Scarlet (dropping the second t) but a) without the second t, it's more of a colour name and b) it's too similar to my own name

This message was edited 10/10/2023, 1:39 PM

vote up1
Maybe Sumner or Garner?
vote up3
Fifer or Tinker
vote up1
Bailey, Harper, Jäger (is German and means hunter) or Parker
vote up1
I really like Paige for a girl, so I’d go with that one.
vote up1
Miller Sage or Quiller Sage
vote up1
Ooh, I'll jump on the Sage/Schuyler bandwagon. I much prefer Schuyler for a male but Sage is all-feminine to me... though, I could see why it wouldn't count.
vote up1
SchuylerSky
vote up1
If Sage counts, I would pick that. Otherwise, as per the above. And I would probably simplify it to Skyler "Sky".
vote up1
!?!! read the post
vote up1
What are you objection to? They responded to the prompt I gave.
vote up4
Would Queen count? If not, I guess I'd pick Justice over most; after that, it's a tie between Schuyler and Turner.

This message was edited 10/9/2023, 9:14 PM

vote up1
Piper.

This message was edited 10/9/2023, 8:14 PM

vote up1
I would probably choose Piper :)
I think Page and Scout could also be cute.
But now that I think about it, I kind of love Miller "Millie", especially if Miller was an honoring surname!
vote up1
Lorimer is a pretty cool occupational surname. Maybe that one.
vote up3
Brewer. I'd call her Brew.
vote up2
Harper, because I honestly love it.
vote up1
I have nothing against Sawyer. The rest are either kinda mid or just... no.(Parker is OK, I guess, but Miller is... what's a nice way to say "absolutely not?")

This message was edited 10/9/2023, 4:16 PM

vote up1